When it comes to the three different
network laws Metcalfe’s law, which is the law that states that the value of that particular telecommunications network is directly proportional tot he square of the number of users on the system (n2), is what I agree with the most. It was created by George Gilder in 1993 in
relation to Robert Metcalfe the principles of Ethernet, which is our method of
data transfer today from modems to routers and then Wi-Fi. The larger the
network with compatible devices connected to that network , the
more the worth of that value, whether that is in terms of money or data. All of
the devices connected to the network are in turn connected to each other multiplying
the worth of the network. Each device that is connected to that network is in
tern connected to other networks which allows for cross network communication. Sarnoff’s
law however directly correlates the exact amount of users on the network to the
worth of the network and the users are not connected to each other.
When it comes
to how people get their information from these networks in the next five years
will go to mostly small notifications and tidbits of information due to our
ever shrinking attention spans caused by our electronic devices. The internet
has already taken over as our prime source of our daily information. We can
obtain access to the internet through almost any public building and residence
in the Unites States today. In the next five years companies like Google are
going to be bringing high speed internet access to everyone cheaper and more efficiently
than the phone companies. I believe just this ability to easily access the
internet will change how all of us will soon be getting our information. Just 5
years ago we watched Television more to get our information as well as used our
computers to access the web, now we mostly use our mobile devices to do both.
I agree with your comments on how Google will change how we will be getting our information. I think if any one company has the power to do something like that, it would be them.
ReplyDelete